Global Presence - Sanity in the Digital Age

Two Cents on Politics, Religion, Technology, Cuisine & Culture

  • Home

6

Apr

Rosie O’Donnell

Posted by The Last Word  Published in Pompus Blow-Hards

A sorry creature, Rosie needs our compassion and pity.

Rosie is Missing Link

 If you looked like this, you would probably be angry too. On the other hand, maybe Rosie simply demonstrates the truth of evolution?

One look at her proves the missing link exists!

After all would God or an Intelligent Designer create that?

If you happen to care about what she has to Say; Click Here, but keep your wallett out!

no comment

13

Mar

Huffington Post

Posted by The Last Word  Published in Pompus Blow-Hards

If Huffington doesn’t say blow-hard, what does?

no comment

12

Mar

Michael Savage

Posted by The Last Word  Published in Pompus Blow-Hards

One Anrgy Dscendant of Abraham, who unfortunately doesn’t abide by the laws of Moses. Michael Savage’s name says it all.

no comment

10

Mar

Bill O’Reilly

Posted by The Last Word  Published in Pompus Blow-Hards

Get a life Bill and stop taking yourself so seriously. Doesn’t matter what your Political Affiliation is; Bill O’Reilly is a blow-hard

no comment

11

Jan

Received reply from FCC for Reporting Rosie!

Posted by The Last Word  Published in Filth & Vitriol, Pompus Blow-Hards

We know the government is full of red tape, but at least we made it to the review stage. Hopefully, they won’t be politically correct and allow a lesbien to get away with a comment that wouldn’t be allowed from any other social group in our country.

no comment

21

Dec

Notify the FCC of Obscene Broadcasts

Posted by The Last Word  Published in Indoctrination, Pompus Blow-Hards
James 3: 6-10
6 And the tongue is a fire: the world of iniquity among our members is the tongue, which defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the wheel of nature, and is set on fire by hell. 7 For every kind of beasts and birds, of creeping things and things in the sea, is tamed, and hath been tamed by mankind. 8 But the tongue can no man tame; `it is’ a restless evil, `it is’ full of deadly poison. 9 Therewith bless we the Lord and Father; and therewith curse we men, who are made after the likeness of God: 10 out of the same mouth cometh forth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be.

Rosie O’Donnell’s rant against Donald Trump is all over the news, but the Media is failing to point out that her comments should be reported to the FCC for indecency.

The first Amendment gives us the right to make all kinds of comments on television, providing that they are not profane (or aired between 6:00 AM and 10:00 PM). Rosie’s comment that Trump should “sit and spin” was filthy, reprehensible and no different than stating that he should go “Profanity for reproductive act” himself. But since we as a society and as Christians have allowed homosexuality into the mainstream, we have allowed them (in this case the Lesbian Rosie O’Donnell) to use terminology on television that a would not be tolerated from a non-homosexual.

The comment that Trump should “sit and spin” is a clear homosexual reference to a vulgar act. This type of language should not be allowed on any television station when a child could hear it. Personally, I believe it shouldn’t be allowed on public air waves under any circumstances.

If you would like to file a complaint with the FCC for profane, obscene, or indecent content on public airwaves visit this site:

http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/cib/fcc475B.cfm

Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554

Phone: 1-888-CALL-FCC (1-888-225-5322)
TTY: 1-888-TELL-FCC (1-888-835-5322)
Fax: 1-866-418-0232
E-mail: fccinfo@fcc.gov

If you would like to file a complaint against Rosie O’Donnell’s offensive language, here are some details you will need to know:

Network: ABC
Date: 12/20/06

You will also need to look up your local time and station for the complaint form

no comment

21

Dec

Notify the FCC of Rosie’s Obscene Broadcast

Posted by The Last Word  Published in Moral Depravity, Pompus Blow-Hards

Rosie O’Donnell’s rant against Donald Trump is all over the news, but the Media is failing to point out that her comments should be reported to the FCC for indecency.

The first Amendment gives us the right to make all kinds of comments on television, providing that they are not profane (or aired between 6:00 AM and 10:00 PM). Rosie’s comment that Trump should “sit and spin” was filthy, reprehensible and no different than stating that he should go “Profanity for reproductive act” himself. But since we as a society have allowed homosexuality into the mainstream, we have allowed them (in this case the Lesbian Rosie O’Donnell) to use terminology on television that a would not be tolerated from a non-homosexual.

The comment that Trump should “sit and spin” is a clear homosexual reference to a vulgar act. This type of language should not be allowed on any television station when a child could hear it. Personally, I believe it shouldn’t be allowed on public air waves under any circumstances.

If you would like to file a complaint with the FCC for profane, obscene, or indecent content on public airwaves visit this site:

http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/cib/fcc475B.cfm

Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554

Phone: 1-888-CALL-FCC (1-888-225-5322)
TTY: 1-888-TELL-FCC (1-888-835-5322)
Fax: 1-866-418-0232
E-mail: fccinfo@fcc.gov

If you would like to file a complaint against Rosie O’Donnell’s offensive language, here are some details you will need to know:

Network: ABC
Date: 12/20/06

You will also need to look up your local time and station for the complaint form

no comment

21

Nov

The Humor of Racism?

Posted by The Last Word  Published in Moral Depravity, Pompus Blow-Hards

The next hot topic of the local news is the outburst by Michael Richards of Sienfeld Fame.

In this outburst, Michael Richards uses “racial Slurs” against people of African Decent.

* As Christian, we should not give any credibility to the term “race”. God created the heavens and the earth. So there is no race, we all came from Adam and Eve.

Even if you believe in evolution, there is still no room for race among human beings. The definition of race, clearly dictates that when two races breed, all offspring will not be viable (the offspring of a horse and a donkey is known as a mule which is sterile; hence the Horse and Donkey are of different races).

Therefore, there is No such thing as Race among Mankind. Since men and women of all colors can reproduce offspring that can in turn produce offspring.

The truly interesting part about the public outrage against Michael Richards is this; When making the comments, the audience laughs until the tone becomes agressive between Richards and his hecklers.

Yet in all of the network coverage, no one (I listened to anumber of networks and searched a number of websites) commented upon the audience’s reaction except to say they were in shock.

There is no excuse! It doesn’t take a few laughs to know what is right and what is wrong!

James: 3 - 10:out of the same mouth cometh forth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be.

no comment

21

Nov

Michael Richards and the Humor of Racism?

Posted by The Last Word  Published in Pompus Blow-Hards, Progressive Agendas

The next hot topic of the local news is the outburst by Michael Richards of Sienfeld Fame.

In this outburst, Michael Richards uses “racial Slurs” (ethnic slurs is more appropriate - scientifically speaking there is only one race among men) against people of African Decent.

The truly interesting part about the public outrage against Michael Richards is this; When making the comments, the audience laughs until the tone becomes agressive between Richards and his hecklers.

Yet in all of the network coverage, we were unable to find any comments on the audience’s reaction except to say they were in shock.

There is no excuse! It doesn’t take a few laughs to know what is right and what is wrong!

no comment

27

Jan

Democrats Respond - State of the Union 2001

Posted by The Last Word  Published in Pompus Blow-Hards, Propaganda

Daschell and GephardtIn their response to the president’s address, the two Democratic congressional leaders outline their party’s positions on the Republican proposals.  Rep. Richard Gephardt and Sen. Tom Daschle tell Americans that they are not smart enough to spend their own money, so the Government needs to tax it from them.

Rep. Richard Gephardt: Good evening. I’m Dick Gephardt from Missouri, Democratic leader in the House of Representatives.

Sen. Tom Daschle: I’m Tom Daschle, of South Dakota, the Democratic leader in the Senate.

Tom DaschellTonight, our nation’s Capitol was filled with hope as our new president spoke to Congress, for the first time, about his priorities for America. Now, we’d like to take a few minutes to speak to the American people: to those we are fortunate to represent in South Dakota and Missouri and across America, the hard-working Americans who deserve a booming and vibrant economy, the seniors who seek security in retirement after a lifetime of hard work. We want to speak to the teachers and students who are striving to master the ideas of the new century in crowded classrooms built in the last century and to all Americans who want to know that in the halls of our government, their voices are heard and their priorities matter. We believe, as they do, that America’s prosperity must work for all Americans.

When President Bush proposes ideas that bring us closer to that goal — like his literacy initiative, or increases in military pay — we will work with him, and work hard, to turn those ideas into laws. When he makes proposals with which we disagree, we will work with him to find common ground. But when he insists on proposals that threaten the prosperity of all Americans, or that harm Social Security or Medicare, we will fight, and fight hard, to put the interests of working families first.

Tom DaschellTonight we begin a debate that will profoundly effect the strength of America’s working families for years, perhaps generations, to come. The prosperity you have built these last eight years has given us all a chance to live better lives at every age. But this opportunity will be squandered if we repeat the mistakes of a generation ago.

Headed Back to Deficits?

In 1981, Dick and I sat in the House Chamber when another new president talked to the American people about stimulating our economy. The words spoken that evening were strikingly similar to the message we heard tonight. We were promised that if we gave huge tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans, the benefits would trickle down, deficits would disappear and the economy would flourish.

Congress supported that experiment. It was a huge mistake. As President Bush’s own Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill said recently, it put America, “in a ditch that was horrendous.” Deficits skyrocketed. The national debt quadrupled. High interest rates choked American industries. Unemployment soared. Working families struggled to meet their mortgages, pay for health care and save for college.

It took us 18 years, four acts of Congress, and a lot of hard work by the American people to get out of that ditch. But working together, we turned record Deficits into record surpluses. Freed from the dead weight of Deficits, you did what Americans do best. You worked hard, and you created the longest economic expansion in history.

Now America has a choice. What shall we do with the blessings of our new prosperity? Our first priority must be to continue paying down the trillions of dollars in federal debt Washington ran up in the 1980s. We can’t just pass this debt onto our children, not when we have the ability to pay it off.

Tom DaschellBy paying down the debt, we’ll also keep Interest rates low, which will mean real savings for every American family. We agree with the president. We want a significant tax cut this year. But we want a different kind: a tax cut that is part of a responsible budget, that lets us pay off the debt and invest in America’s future, one that is fair to all Americans.

President Bush’s plan doesn’t do those things.

Think about your own family budget. Imagine you hadn’t saved for your retirement, you owed money on your credit cards and you couldn’t afford health insurance. Then you’re told you might get some extra money sometime down the road. What would you do? Under the president’s approach, you would immediately spend that money — money you might never see — without taking care of your debts, your medical bills or your retirement. You wouldn’t do that, and neither should we. But that’s exactly what the president proposed tonight.

Let’s take a closer look. First, the president’s tax plan is far more expensive than the $1.6 trillion he claims. When you add interest on the debt and other hidden costs, the true cost of the president’s tax cut is well over $2 trillion. It will consume nearly all of the available surplus, at the expense of prescription drug coverage, education, defense and other critical priorities.

Even worse, instead of strengthening Social Security and Medicare, the president’s plan actually takes money from both programs. That is irresponsible and it’s wrong. Worse still, the president’s plan depends far too heavily on a 10-year budget estimate, which is no more reliable than a 10-year weather forecast. And there’s no room for error.

Tom DaschellNobody’s crystal ball is that good. Just ask Texas. Two years ago, using rosy forecasts, then-Governor Bush signed a budget that cut taxes by $1.8 billion. But his budget projections were wrong. Today Texas. faces a serious budget shortfall. If his budget predictions now are as faulty as they were then, his tax cut would bring back huge Deficits, increase the national debt, and put our economy back in the ditch.

Finally, the president’s plan is deeply unfair to middle-income Americans. The wealthiest 1 percent, people who make an average of over $900,000 a year, get 43 percent of the president’s tax cut. The president also wants to eliminate the estate tax for the wealthiest of the wealthy. Democrats want to make it easier for you to pass family farms and small businesses onto the next generation, and our estate tax plan does that. But the president’s proposal provides so much to America’s wealthiest families that they themselves are calling it a mistake. Bill Gates Sr., Warren Buffett, members of the Rockefeller family have said it gives so much to so few that it will force tax increases, or cuts in Social Security, Medicare and other essential programs. They’re right. And the president’s estate tax cut is only part of the reason.

Let us be clear: All Americans deserve a tax cut. But surely, the wealthiest among us should not get it at the expense of working families. There’s a better way.

The Democratic Proposal

Richard Gephardt

REP. GEPHARDT: Democrats have a different plan, a balanced plan that treats the national budget the way you treat your household budget. Our plan provides $900 billion in tax cuts for all Americans. Our plan protects every dollar of the Social Security and Medicare trust funds. It strengthens Medicare and adds an affordable prescription Drug benefit, so seniors don’t have to choose between food and medicine. It strengthens Social Security rather than subjecting it to a volatile stock market, so that it will be there, not only for the baby boomers, but for their children and their grandchildren.

Our plan enables us to keep paying down the national debt, the debt we ran up in the ’80s, so we can keep Interest rates low and keep our economy growing. And it invests in the future of our country, by making sure every child can get an excellent Education at a first-rate public school.

The president touched on many of these goals tonight, but we can’t accomplish any of them if we spend the entire surplus on the president’s tax cut. If what the president said tonight sounded too good to be true, it probably is.

Education is one of our highest priorities, and we believe that strengthening public schools is one of our greatest challenges. The president has made Education an important part of his agenda, and in this he has our support. We have our differences with his plan. Like most Americans, we do not support spending public money for private school vouchers, and we will never support a reduction in the federal commitment to under-served children and communities. We will work with the president to increase literacy, demand accountability, and improve every public school. But with tax cuts consuming almost all of the projected surplus, he cannot possibly keep his commitment to leave no child behind.

Richard GephardtMillions of seniors depend on Social Security and Medicare, and we have a responsibility to preserve and protect them. We made promises. We need to keep them. The president said he is dedicated to preserving Social Security and Medicare We take him at his word. But the president’s plan threatens these critical programs. His plan fails to set aside the resources Social Security and Medicare will need in the future and uses them instead to pay for his tax cut.

All seniors need prescription Drug coverage. Democrats believe we should use part of the surplus to provide a reliable, affordable Medicare prescription Drug benefit for all seniors. The president has a different approach. His plan excludes millions of middle-income seniors who don’t have prescription coverage and need it.

We want to work with the president to solve the prescription Drug problem the right way. But we can’t add a Medicare prescription Drug benefit, we can’t improve public schools, we can’t address any of our highest priorities if the president does not scale back the excesses of his tax plan.

Richard GephardtPresident Bush’s numbers just don’t add up; ours do. His plan leaves no money for anything except tax cuts; ours does. Our plan is better. It invests in the greatest needs and highest priorities of our country.

The conversation we begin tonight is more than a struggle over this year’s budget; it’s really about our future. It is about the most important decisions this generation of Americans will make for a very long time to come.

Our country is strong. But we can make it stronger, by fighting for stronger families with a higher minimum wage, a patients’ bill of rights, safer schools, safer streets and a cleaner environment; by fighting for a stronger economy with a budget that extends the greatest economic expansion in American history; by fighting for a stronger democracy with real campaign finance reform and a renewed commitment to fair and modern elections.

The challenge of writing a budget that is fair and responsible is considerable, but we face other challenges just as great.

All across America, too many people have lost faith in the fundamental principle of democracy: the principle of one person, one vote. We must act to restore their confidence. We should not leave this session of Congress without reforming our election process. Our democracy depends on it.

Richard GephardtIn addition, too many in Washington, and too many Americans, have lost faith in the possibility of principled compromise. With Congress so closely divided, some would say that finding common ground is simply impossible. We refuse to believe that. We are determined to steer our country on a more productive course.

We recognize that the president campaigned on an agenda. So did we. Where our agendas coincide, let us make quick progress for the people. Where our agendas differ, we ask the president to demonstrate his leadership by reaching out for the benefit of all Americans. If he extends his hand, we will grasp it. Tonight, we extend ours.

The things that are most meaningful in our lives often require real effort to meet others halfway: business partnerships, friendships, marriages. It’s the same with our democracy. We can do what the people sent us here to do if the president is willing to join us in the middle.

We believe that making America better is the greatest work of all. It is to that task that we pledge ourselves tonight.

no comment

Search

Articles

  • About Global Presence
  • The Liberal / Rino Challenge

Topics

  • Dictators & Progressives (16)
    • Liberal Pansies (1)
    • Pompus Blow-Hards (10)
    • Tax and Spend (1)
  • Elections & Politics (18)
    • Ballsie Conservatives (2)
    • Disenfranchisement (2)
    • Divided States (1)
    • Filth & Vitriol (2)
    • Graft (1)
    • Who Would Be King (6)
  • Entertainment (5)
    • Lyrics (4)
    • Movies & Stage (1)
  • Food & Wine (17)
    • Cheeses & Dairy (1)
    • Crockpot (2)
    • Entrees (2)
    • Fish & Poultry (7)
    • Pasta (1)
    • Pork (1)
    • Sauces & Condiments (1)
    • Seasonings (2)
    • Side Dishes (2)
  • History (9)
    • Historic Documents (8)
    • Revisionism (1)
  • Humor (9)
    • Just Plain Funny (6)
    • Ridiculed A Lib Today? (2)
  • In God We Trust (8)
    • Church & State (4)
    • Moral Depravity (4)
  • News & Current Events (21)
    • Jackass of the Week (1)
    • Man Know Not His Time (2)
    • Periodicals & Sources (6)
    • Updates (1)
  • Progressive Agendas (23)
    • Extreme Court (2)
    • Indoctrination (6)
    • Liberal Intolerance (4)
    • New Speak (6)
    • Politics of Destruction (1)
    • Propaganda (5)
  • Reviews (2)
    • Books & Periodicals (1)
  • Theology (6)
    • Apologetics (1)
    • Applied Errancy (3)
    • Stewardship (1)
  • What's New (6)
    • Meaningless Trivia (4)
  • World Views (15)
    • Abortion & Euthanasia (1)
    • Affirmative Reaction (4)
    • Consensus Science (3)
    • Eugenics & Homicide (4)

Resources

  • Website Graphics
  • Website Marketing
  • Website Templates

Archives

  • April 2008 (1)
  • March 2008 (3)
  • February 2008 (1)
  • January 2008 (2)
  • December 2007 (2)
  • November 2007 (6)
  • October 2007 (4)
  • August 2007 (4)
  • July 2007 (4)
  • June 2007 (6)
  • May 2007 (3)
  • April 2007 (21)
  • March 2007 (15)
  • February 2007 (1)
  • January 2007 (2)
  • December 2006 (6)
  • November 2006 (15)
  • October 2006 (9)
  • September 2006 (4)
  • August 2006 (1)
  • July 2006 (7)
  • June 2006 (5)
  • January 2006 (1)
  • June 2005 (2)
  • June 2004 (1)
  • January 2001 (1)
  • July 2000 (1)
  • October 1998 (1)
  • June 1998 (1)

Meta

  • Login
  • Main Entries Rss
  • Comments Rss
May 2008
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Recent Post

  • What does a computer look like from the inside?
  • Random Picture of Computer
  • Buy a House Get a Life
  • Want Change? Vote for an ObamaNation!
  • All about white people
  • Find Books on Amazon
  • Democrats asked to put money where their mouth is
  • Trader Joe’s Peach Salsa
  • What’s a Connifer?
  • Global Presence has a New Face!

Recent Comments

  • 2008 Presidential Election » … in Democrats asked to put money where their mouth is
  • Mike Spreng in If Women Ruled the World
  • Daniel Patterson in Big Mouth, Little Brain, Much Courage
  • crawfordslist » Cut the Victi… in Give Imus A Break
  • JSaeler in Pastor has Guts… Do you?
  • Daniel in Pastor has Guts… Do you?
  • The Hypocrisy of the Donkey Democra… in Monster Pig and False Doctrine
© 2007 Global Presence - Sanity in the Digital Age
Theme by Wired Studios, courtesy of Corvette Garage
Valid XHTML | Valid CSS 3.0
Powered by Wordpress